Representing thousands of talcum powder lawsuit cases, we can answer all your questions about your potential talcum powder case. Connect with one of our top talcum powder lawyers today and together we can hold these product manufacturers accountable for their actions!
Do I have a case?
Complete the form below to find out if you qualify for compensation.
"*" indicates required fields
Complete the form above and within hours, our intake support team or representative from the law firm will be in touch to start the process.
Our team will walk you through all the information needed to determine your damages and qualification. All of your questions will be answered, and the process will be explained in detail.
Once your information has been collected, you’ll receive the support from our experienced attorneys and medical experts, who have won millions in damages for people just like you.
No fees unless you are awarded compensation.
If you or a family member used talcum powder and has been diagnosed with one of the cancers listed below, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit:
Symptoms of mesothelioma may include
Symptoms of mesothelioma may include
Legal decisions involving talcum powder and cancer are making headlines in the media. One talcum powder manufacturer, Johnson & Johnson (J&J) has suffered legal defeats in court, totaling jury awards of as much as $100 million in damages.
Between jury trials and negotiated settlements, J&J may be liable for billions of dollars. The plaintiffs in many cases claim that using J&J talcum powder led to their cancer.
J&J is facing ongoing lawsuits from consumers around the country. Tens of thousands of lawsuits have been filed alleging a link between ovarian cancer and use of talc powder for feminine hygiene.
Thousands of lawsuits have also been filed against J&J alleging that their talc caused mesothelioma.
“J&J knew for decades that small amounts of asbestos had occasionally been found in its raw talc and in Baby Powder and Shower to Shower, based on test results from the early 1970s to the early 2000s – information it did not disclose to regulators or the public,” according to Reuters.
